I offer services to help enterprises identify, understand and effectively deal with the risks they face.
I consider my services to be "bespoke"; i.e., customized rather than "standard" or "off-the-shelf."
That said, the following items often find their way into my engagement:
Please see below for more information.
Risk Assessment
includes identification of as many risks facing the enterprise as possible and then calculating likely effects of those risks and/or the variation in those effects. This is not simply a checklist-and-list-of-insurance-policies exercise. I do this using, as appropriate:
This is the first step in determining how to treat those risks. (See below.)
The oft used normal/best/worst case of project or scenario analysis yields little in the way of useful risk information because it does not evaluate variability or likelihood of the scenario. Nor does it help you understand the drivers of any particular outcome. Our risk assessment calculates not only the multiple possible scenarios, it also identifies the drivers of those scenarios and gives you some clues as to how to improve your situation.
Risk Analysis
on the other hand, takes the output from the risk assessment and examines the variability and impact of the various risks on the enterprise or project. It identifies weaknesses and errors in a plan, and guides management on ways to improve its situation and likelihood of success.
Risk Treatment
refers to what you do with a particular risk now that you have a quality assessment and analysis. Risk treatments generally fall into these categories (and generally applied in this order):
I offer services in evaluation, design and implementation of risk treatment methods.
With regard to insurance - Let me say. right here, that I do not sell ordinary, commodity insurance; so I do not compete with insurance agents and brokers. I don’,t and I don’t want to!
I expect that your selected insurance agent will sell you, at least, the standard typical insurance policies necessary for your enterprise. However, I do know a lot about insurance, and I can guide and assist the executive in matters of agent/broker qualification/selection and insurance evaluation and selection.
That said, there may be opportunities to transfer a risk through an insurance-type mechanism that your agent or broker doesn’t know how to use or is prohibited from using. In those cases, I may get involved in the placement.
With regard to risk control – Your insurer or broker probably provides some kind of “loss control” or safety program. These are generally directed toward work injuries, fleets, product liabilities, or property risks covered by their policies. Many of these programs are good as far as they go, but many are deficient in critical areas. I don’t purport to be in the risk control business per se, but I often help shore up the deficiencies and fill the gaps.
With regard to risk retention – Risk retention means keeping the effects of the risk “in house”. This is not a bad thing! Retaining a risk gives the enterprise much more control over what happens. However, unlimited and unplanned risk retention is reckless.
Risk retention (or more appropriately, loss retention) decisions require not only the use of actuarial techniques and probability/statistical analysis of the retained losses, but also a risk-based three-statement financial analysis. This is especially important when the enterprise requires surety bonding!
Some common methods of risk retention (with which I can assist the executive or board) include:
Specific Services in Support of the Enterprise Risk Management Practices
Copyright © 2025 FRED R. WHITE RISK MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING, LLC - All Rights Reserved.
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.